<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick post: What&#8217;s the fuss about resveratrol when you can have a 5HT2c appetite suppressant do the same thing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurologicalcorrelates.com/wordpress/2008/06/07/quick-post-whats-the-fuss-about-resveratrol-when-you-can-have-a-5ht2c-appetite-suppressant-do-the-same-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurologicalcorrelates.com/wordpress/2008/06/07/quick-post-whats-the-fuss-about-resveratrol-when-you-can-have-a-5ht2c-appetite-suppressant-do-the-same-thing/</link>
	<description>A Neuroscience Tabloid of Dysfunctional Behavior - Mostly Psychopaths, Narcissists, Obesity and Addiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: swivelchair</title>
		<link>http://neurologicalcorrelates.com/wordpress/2008/06/07/quick-post-whats-the-fuss-about-resveratrol-when-you-can-have-a-5ht2c-appetite-suppressant-do-the-same-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-24989</link>
		<dc:creator>swivelchair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurologicalcorrelates.com/wordpress/2008/06/07/quick-post-whats-the-fuss-about-resveratrol-when-you-can-have-a-5ht2c-appetite-suppressant-do-the-same-thing/#comment-24989</guid>
		<description>Sandra, Sandra, Sandra (said in tone of Marcia, Marcia, Marcia). 

OK, for the sake of argument let&#039;s assume that having a BMI of 25-29.9 is not detrimental to one&#039;s health as compared to those of BMI 18.5 to 25. Let&#039;s assume that for anyone of normal or overweight that a day or two of fasting a month will provide the same effects as resveratrol: caloric restriction basically gives the cells a rest (to vastly oversimplify).

Using an appetite suppressant for caloric restriction seems to be a shortcut, is my point.

Actually, my point was really that Glaxo overpaid because I bet you can get the resveratrol effects by caloric restriction (overlapping transcripts and all).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandra, Sandra, Sandra (said in tone of Marcia, Marcia, Marcia). </p>
<p>OK, for the sake of argument let&#8217;s assume that having a BMI of 25-29.9 is not detrimental to one&#8217;s health as compared to those of BMI 18.5 to 25. Let&#8217;s assume that for anyone of normal or overweight that a day or two of fasting a month will provide the same effects as resveratrol: caloric restriction basically gives the cells a rest (to vastly oversimplify).</p>
<p>Using an appetite suppressant for caloric restriction seems to be a shortcut, is my point.</p>
<p>Actually, my point was really that Glaxo overpaid because I bet you can get the resveratrol effects by caloric restriction (overlapping transcripts and all).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://neurologicalcorrelates.com/wordpress/2008/06/07/quick-post-whats-the-fuss-about-resveratrol-when-you-can-have-a-5ht2c-appetite-suppressant-do-the-same-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-24988</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurologicalcorrelates.com/wordpress/2008/06/07/quick-post-whats-the-fuss-about-resveratrol-when-you-can-have-a-5ht2c-appetite-suppressant-do-the-same-thing/#comment-24988</guid>
		<description>But the NHANES data shows the opposite, overweight is good, underweight is bad:

 * Underweight individuals (BMI of less than 18.5) had a higher risk of death with nearly 34,000 more deaths than expected.

 * Being overweight (BMI of 25-29.9) was not associated with excess mortality. The study found that 87,000 fewer deaths than expected were associated with being overweight.

http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/fs050419.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the NHANES data shows the opposite, overweight is good, underweight is bad:</p>
<p> * Underweight individuals (BMI of less than 18.5) had a higher risk of death with nearly 34,000 more deaths than expected.</p>
<p> * Being overweight (BMI of 25-29.9) was not associated with excess mortality. The study found that 87,000 fewer deaths than expected were associated with being overweight.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/fs050419.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/fs050419.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
